getting to 2000k is pretty easy, actually

@xDoubledragon said in #39:
> Most profiles have 200 point lower to equal elo of blitzs
> I never see reverse tho
Try profiles on this forum page: 3 users (Stephenps, filthiestheote, GW-ISR) have higher blitz rating than rapid and 2 users (nadjarostowa, xDoubledragon) have higher rapid rating than blitz. (2 cannot be compared as they don't have both.)

(By "this" I meant page 4 with your comment.)

@mkubecek said in #33:
> Compared to your ratings, those "subpar stats" are 461 higher in rapid and 234 in blitz so I wonder what should yours be called?
>
> And these unprovoked attacks at anyone who dares to disagree with you while complaining loudly about "being attacked" are even more pathetic.

erm, you're kinda slow too?
25000 games with the same constant decrease and increase is honestly ????

@j88q said in #36:
> @filthiesteote, as I'm writing this, you have a total of 86 dislikes in this topic.
> I'd advise you to start a subreddit.
1. you counted?
2. you do realize that your support system is based on external validation?????????????
3. I don't care

@filthiesteote said in #44:
> 25000 games with the same constant decrease and increase is honestly ????
Still significantly better than me or you. Magnus Carlsen's ELO is only 4 points higher than in July 2010, does it make him a complete loser that he made no progress in 14 years? I don't think so.

@mkubecek said in #46:
> Still significantly better than me or you. Magnus Carlsen's ELO is only 4 points higher than in July 2010, does it make him a complete loser that he made no progress in 14 years? I don't think so.
there's a difference between being so high that there's no one to challenge /or not play those many games but in @StephenPS case, he's played over 25000 games.
if a monkey's given enough time to play 25000 games, it'll be 2200 by the end of it ;)

@filthiesteote said in #47:
> if a monkey's given enough time to play 25000 games, it'll be 2200 by the end of it
No, it would not. Neither would most of the people. You know what? Show us that you actually can reach that level, then you might have a chance that someone will take you seriously.

@xDoubledragon said in #41:
> Okay still rare but not as rare as 1400 rapid and 1800 blitzs
you're right

@filthiesteote
You have been saying things about players about 300-400+ points above your rating by which you are essentially (or straight up ) saying you are better than them. They include "you cant say anything", "my positional play exceeds yours manifold" " you are so slow" . You are not. Face the reality. It will take you months, possibly years to even get to their level, so in the meantime dont act like you are better than them with little to no skill to back you up.

Plus you have also been insulting basically everyone who tries to go against you, which is against fourm etiquette and the amount you have been doing this is probably going to get you chatbanned pretty soon.

Give tips to reach 2000 after getting there.

dont disrespectful to players who would crush you 100/100 times, or to anyone for that matter

When looking at number of games and rating of a user, take into account not everyone plays to improve, many people play for fun too.

1800 already puts you in the top 25%, by no means easy. Plus 1800-2000 is still a big gap, which you certainly wont overcome by getting flagged by move 30, while not improving your position hoping that a 2000 rated player will randomly blunder a piece.

bro's 1400 and says 2000 is easy XD. If it was easy you would be 2000.

@filthiesteote said in #47:
> there's a difference between being so high that there's no one to challenge /or not play those many games but in @StephenPS case, he's played over 25000 games.
> if a monkey's given enough time to play 25000 games, it'll be 2200 by the end of it ;)
I just love chess. So I play a lot.