lichess.org
Donate

Earn the right to chat as Anon

Now that we are all safe from the evil Anons, even those who were unwilling or unable to uncheck a check-box and still insisted to play versus Anon players, while not able to deal with the circumstances that there are idiots out there in the world, I wonder if it would harm anyone if Anons would be able to chat with each other.

For me it has taken away a lot of fun.
I am unable to communicate. That is very frustrating.
Let me point out some situations where I would want to chat with my fellow Anon opponent.

- After a couple of fun games/rematches I usually wanna roll a cigarette and continue playing. So I wanna say "Hold on for a second please. Need a cigarette.". In like 100% of the cases play would continue after a few words in the chat. Now if I roll a cigarette, games are aborted, cause my opponent does not know why I do not move right away. You can replace "rolling a cigarette" with any activity that would take only a few seconds if you do not smoke.

- Sometimes it happens you recognize an opponent just by his play. You are sure you have played against this opponent the days before on numerous occasions. You never talked but you enjoyed the games, cause you liked the lines he played.
You eventually start to talk and your opponent recognizes you as well.
Chess friendships my arise. You have learned to know someone by chess only. Not by a profile first, but by the way he plays chess. This is not possible anymore.

- I am a nice person. I feel the need to say some friendly words when I played some fun games. I am raised like that and I am now forbidden to do that. That feels like Neo with a sealed mouth.

I do not want to continue to describe situations where Anons would want to chat, even if I could give you countless examples where it was so much better to play as Anon with the ability to chat. Frankly I never did care about rude people. I do not do that in the the world out there, and I especially do not care about unfriendly words on the internet.

As Thibault did state in another topic, the reason to mute Anons were spambots, I would like to ask if there could be compromise.
Wouldn't it be possible to deal with rematches played by Anon vs. Anon as if this games were "Play with a friend" games?
Like this, chat would be possible again, once both players have proven they are just anonymous chess players that are willing to play with each other again.

So I propose to earn the right to chat, by playing chess.
I never encountered spam bots and I play 98% of my games as anon.
I agree with you. I sometimes play from other computers and I don't want to login to the site. It was better when you could chat with other anons.

It's really useful sometimes, for example when you need to go away from the computer for a moment and ask time, maybe to discuss some other issues, maybe to try to know who you are playing with, etc. And you could easily ignore if the other anon was rude. At first i also thought that this was to incentive people to register at the site, and i was fine with that, but if that's isn't a reason, i have my doubts, but maybe there are good technical reasons
OMG it's taken literally YEARS for them to get rid of Anon chat, and now some people want it back :D
"Them" being Helen Lovejoy&friends? :D
@jorjo now i read your post entirely and realize that the reasons i said, were already listed by you...sorry about that
#6 Them being the Mods. Anons should never have had chat. It's too open to abuse because there are so many trolls about. If people want to use the resource, they should at least be vaguely accountable for their actions whilst doing so.
I was not aware that anonymous chat is a problem for the mods, besides topics popping up frequently, in which Helen Lovejoy&friends complain about "words on the internet".
And I strongly oppose the opinion that anybody has to be held accountable for "words on the internet" to which no one has to listen. Especially not if the measure to do so affects people who are innocent of any word-crime committed. ;-)
It does feel like closing the library cause rubbish books are written. That is wrong. Do not read the rubbish books and love your library.

I truly hope the reason to mute anonymous chat were spambots, and therefore I thought about how to solve the problem in a clever way: A game of chess as a chat-captcha.
If this is not the case and Helen Lovejoy&friends once more succeeded, then there is nothing left to say besides: How sad...

Side-note to the statement:
"Anons should never have had chat. It's too open to abuse because there are so many trolls about"

Anons should have chat cause there are some many trolls around.
It is a well known and time proven measure for any community, to give them a playground.
Yesterday I had an encounter with one of the sad trolls, that now can not do his thing anymore. He started to add time and ask for take-backs again and again. I joined in to make him a little happy and accepted all that requests, repeating the position over and over again, try a little morse-code ___ ... ___ with the +15 sec button and such things. After maybe 5 minutes of ridiculousness he finally allowed the mate in one.
Two buttons had to be chosen (only allowed two!) and the best words to say were Good Game! Well played! which made me giggle after that encounter and it seemed his urge to troll was satisfied for a while.
As well as a playground for trolls the community does need voluntary social workers like me to satisfy the needs of the trolls.
Our work is now extremely hard as you can imagine.
Lol, I don't know who this "Helen Lovejoy & friends" you're obsessing about are, but it seems she/they have got right up your nose!

You're entitled to your opinion of course, but mine is that Anons shouldn't have chat and I'm glad they don't. Some of the things trolls come out with are pretty disgusting. Generally, those with an account are far better behaved, and those who aren't may be silenced.

We're here to play chess, not for an exercise in free speech. Let's exercise our right to speak, by all means - but do so in a manner that one would if an old lady was in the room.

Where normal respect is not given freely in a place like this, it may be enforced. That's fine by me.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.