@AAACrazyhouseStudent said in #12:
> I know , if read you will understand !
* if you read you will understand
> I know , if read you will understand !
* if you read you will understand
@giancz91 said in #6:
> @AAACrazyhouseStudent I think it's likely you're E3_player. Probably your account was banned, you eliminated it and created a new one.
>
> I'm not mad at you, even if I should considered all the points you subtracted me xD
> I just wanna ask you: WHY YOU DID THAT? What do you want to obtain? Respect from people here? This is virtual, nobody here knows you, nobody cares of your rating, of your position in leaderboards, of the trophies on your profile. Nobody cares at all!!!
> Or maybe you want respect from chess players you know in real life? My friend, real chess players that play since a lot of years don't care about online achievements because they know cheating is very possible.
>
> If you like chess just play it, doesn't matter if you're strong or weak, I personally respect and have fun with every player, from the weakest to the strongest. The ones I don't like playing with are cheaters, if I choose to play vs humans I don't want to face Stockfish. I hope your next account will be one you'll play clean from. If you'll play clean I'll be happy to face you in the future :) Bye!
Oh yeah, The guy is E3_Player but When I asked him/her, they said no.. So they're lying, In those 2 accounts, their chatting is very same and the Racing kings rating is. So they are the same person.
> @AAACrazyhouseStudent I think it's likely you're E3_player. Probably your account was banned, you eliminated it and created a new one.
>
> I'm not mad at you, even if I should considered all the points you subtracted me xD
> I just wanna ask you: WHY YOU DID THAT? What do you want to obtain? Respect from people here? This is virtual, nobody here knows you, nobody cares of your rating, of your position in leaderboards, of the trophies on your profile. Nobody cares at all!!!
> Or maybe you want respect from chess players you know in real life? My friend, real chess players that play since a lot of years don't care about online achievements because they know cheating is very possible.
>
> If you like chess just play it, doesn't matter if you're strong or weak, I personally respect and have fun with every player, from the weakest to the strongest. The ones I don't like playing with are cheaters, if I choose to play vs humans I don't want to face Stockfish. I hope your next account will be one you'll play clean from. If you'll play clean I'll be happy to face you in the future :) Bye!
Oh yeah, The guy is E3_Player but When I asked him/her, they said no.. So they're lying, In those 2 accounts, their chatting is very same and the Racing kings rating is. So they are the same person.
@Weapon9Knight said in #14:
> Oh yeah, The guy is E3_Player but When I asked him/her, they said no.. So they're lying, In those 2 accounts, their chatting is very same and the Racing kings rating is. So they are the same person.
xD
> Oh yeah, The guy is E3_Player but When I asked him/her, they said no.. So they're lying, In those 2 accounts, their chatting is very same and the Racing kings rating is. So they are the same person.
xD
@Weapon9Knight said in #14:
> Oh yeah, The guy is E3_Player but When I asked him/her, they said no.. So they're lying, In those 2 accounts, their chatting is very same and the Racing kings rating is. So they are the same person.
I didn't mention how I understood he was E3_player because if he read that next time he'll be more careful. Now he read that. Thanks! It will be harder to recognize him.
> Oh yeah, The guy is E3_Player but When I asked him/her, they said no.. So they're lying, In those 2 accounts, their chatting is very same and the Racing kings rating is. So they are the same person.
I didn't mention how I understood he was E3_player because if he read that next time he'll be more careful. Now he read that. Thanks! It will be harder to recognize him.
@giancz91 said in #16:
> I didn't mention how I understood he was E3_player because if he read that next time he'll be more careful. Now he read that. Thanks! It will be harder to recognize him.
Very funny , you both like kids xD
> I didn't mention how I understood he was E3_player because if he read that next time he'll be more careful. Now he read that. Thanks! It will be harder to recognize him.
Very funny , you both like kids xD
@giancz91 said in #16:
> I didn't mention how I understood he was E3_player because if he read that next time he'll be more careful. Now he read that. Thanks! It will be harder to recognize him.
Yes, I just told how same they were., There may be many, I just knew this much
> I didn't mention how I understood he was E3_player because if he read that next time he'll be more careful. Now he read that. Thanks! It will be harder to recognize him.
Yes, I just told how same they were., There may be many, I just knew this much
@Weapon9Knight said in #18:
> Yes, I just told how same they were., There may be many, I just knew this much
...
Hah , how do you think ?
E3_Player = Man ,who like play e3 , he isn't good ,because e4 is better then e3 xD
> Yes, I just told how same they were., There may be many, I just knew this much
...
Hah , how do you think ?
E3_Player = Man ,who like play e3 , he isn't good ,because e4 is better then e3 xD
@AAACrazyhouseStudent said in #19:
> ...
> Hah , how do you think ?
> E3_Player = Man ,who like play e3 , he isn't good ,because e4 is better then e3 xD
Don't deny that you're E3_Player.
> ...
> Hah , how do you think ?
> E3_Player = Man ,who like play e3 , he isn't good ,because e4 is better then e3 xD
Don't deny that you're E3_Player.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.